Nodesian Equity and Compensation Discussion

DateJanuary 5, 2026
Time8:00 AM PST
IDnodesian-01-05-26

Discuss Spencer's potential equity and compensation with Nodesian.

Nodesian — Pre-Seed Alignment & Trial Run Summary

Date: Jan 5, 2026
Participants: Luis Cisneros, Spencer Wozniak


1. What Spencer Is Looking For (Pre-Seed)

Equity

  • Target: 20% equity
    • Soft commitment to 20% until Jan 15
    • Open to renegotiation if circumstances materially change

Monthly Support (Living Expenses)

  • $3,000 / month
    • Plus any grants or hackathon winnings
    • First month paid up-front
      • If paid up-front → Spencer starts full-time immediately
      • If not paid up-front → start date delayed or scope reduced (not full-time)
    • Renegotiation window: 60–90 days

Post-Funding Salary Expectation

  • $125,000 – $150,000 base salary after funding

2. Trial Run / Immediate Execution Plan

Revenue & Validation Search

  • Luis is actively pursuing ~400 leads
  • Goal: identify 3 parallel opportunities across 3 different sectors
    • Hackathon
      • Now feasible due to having a clinical lead
      • Mid-size hackathons: ~$15k
      • Large hackathons: ~$100k–$150k
    • Client
    • Grant
  • Any winnings or revenue to be split based on contribution

Product Entry Point

  • Browser extension identified as a strong initial product
  • Plan to publish early to establish utility and momentum

3. CTO / Team Performance Checkpoint (Critical)

10-Day Sprint (Now → Jan 15, 2026)

  • David (CTO) must deliver:
    • Front-end
    • Dashboard
  • Jan 15, 2026 = hard deadline
    • Failure to deliver constitutes a breach of contract
    • If unmet:
      • Willingness from Luis to restructure the team
      • Potential to offer Spencer 20% equity
      • David may transition to advisory role with reduced equity

Team Capabilities (As Discussed)

  • JT
    • Can build Neo4j
    • Target equity ~10%
  • David
    • Can bridge API ↔ front-end
    • Has corporate/PE experience, but execution concerns remain
  • Spencer
    • Can cover:
      • Front-end deployment
      • Testing
      • Research components (e.g., Jaccard analysis)
      • Browser extension
      • Publishing
    • Can effectively cover end-to-end technical gaps

4. Cap Table & Equity Context

  • Current CTO equity (~35%) is viewed by others (Rincon, Wixon) as possibly too high
    • But, they think his knowledge may justify it
  • David is not opposed to redistribution, but does not want to go below a certain threshold
  • Luis is actively thinking about cap table reorganization
  • Preference expressed to have doctors as advisors, not heavy operators

5. Legal / Structural Notes

  • Company moving toward a Delaware entity (LLC / C-Corp discussed)
  • Intent is to de-risk for VCs before deep engagement

6. VC & Market Context (Luis's Perspective)

  • Current market pressure due to high interest rates
    • VCs demanding higher ARR and larger equity stakes
    • Example discussed: $750k for 20% + board seat (Glasswing)
  • Strategic bet:
    • Interest rates will decline
    • This will unlock capital and favor companies with strong infrastructure
  • Long-term vision:
    • 5-year roadmap to build a foundational, action-oriented data layer
    • Focus on agentic workflows, not just query-based AI

7. Near-Term Next Steps

  • By Jan 15
    • David's deliverables evaluated
    • Final clarity on:
      • Spencer's equity (15% vs 20%)
      • Team restructuring if needed
  • Next 10 days
    • Luis to pursue customers, grants, and hackathons
    • Follow-up conversations with David and JT
  • By February
    • Target to begin working together in earnest
    • Luis traveling to Texas for client work; needs tangible deliverables

8. Key Open Questions / Decision Points

  • Does David deliver by Jan 15?
  • Is Spencer's equity finalized at 20%?
  • Can monthly support be paid up-front to enable immediate full-time work?
  • Which revenue path hits first: hackathon, client, or grant?

This is a trial-run phase with explicit checkpoints (Jan 15, 60–90 days) where equity, scope, and commitment will be adjusted based on actual delivery and revenue traction, not promises.